4.7 Article

Effect of metal atom in zeolitic imidazolate frameworks (ZIF-8 & 67) for removal of Pb2+ & Hg2+ from water

期刊

FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY
卷 149, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2021.112008

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Heavy metals, such as lead and mercury, pose a major threat to underground water, and the construction of effective materials is crucial to mitigating water pollution. The synthesized MOFs in the study displayed excellent ability to remove lead and mercury, with high environmental remediation performance.
Heavy metals especially lead (Pb) and mercury (Hg) are recognized as most emerging pollutants in underground water and are major threat to public health around the world. Major challenge to mitigate water pollution is construction of effective materials containing a host of deceivingly accessible high-density and high-level efficiency. Herein, we have synthesized two metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) with efficient porosity showing the right combination of structures. Representatively, ZIF-8 and ZIF-67 were designed by reacting Zn, Co salts with 2-methyl imidazole showing superior efficacy in removing Pb and Hg (1978.63&1436.11 mg/g respectively) from water. These adsorbents displayed high distribution values permitting them to quickly reduce concentration level of Pb2+, Hg2+ below permissible limit (Pb = 0-15 mu g/L, Hg = 1-10 mu g/L). EDX, FTIR analysis revealed that Pb2+, Hg2+ bound through weak interactions. Results presented here have shown extraordinary potential with high environmental remediation performance having 99.5% and 98.1% removal efficiency for lead & mercury respectively. Results revealed that adsorbents have same organic linker that identifies same morphology required for adsorption. The difference in adsorption capacity and porosity (ZIF-8 = 937&1370 m(2)/g, ZIF-67 = 1289&1889 m(2)/g) are deliberately caused due to presence of metal atoms having different electronic distribution, as cobalt in ZIF-67 and in case of ZIF-8 zinc metal.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据