4.2 Article

The radiated acoustic pressure and time scales of a spherical bubble

期刊

FLUID DYNAMICS RESEARCH
卷 53, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1873-7005/abd1d0

关键词

bubble dynamics; acoustic radiation; scaling

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Numerical simulations of violent bubble dynamics often encounter numerical instabilities due to two time scales associated with the phenomenon, as revealed by the Keller-Miksis equation. The short time scale for significant acoustic radiation emission from the bubble has been determined and validated through comparison with experimental results.
Numerical simulations of violent bubble dynamics are often associated with numerical instabilities at the end of collapse, when a shock wave is emitted. Based on the Keller-Miksis equation, we show that this is caused by two time scales associated with the phenomenon. Nonsingular equations are thus formed based on asymptotic expansion theory and the time derivatives of the bubble radius are shown to have algebraic singularities in the Mach number. The period of oscillation is shown to divide into two asymptotic layers: a long and short time scale. The short time scale, on which significant acoustic radiation is emitted from the bubble, has been determined to be (R) over bar (max)([(p) over bar (infinity) - (p) over bar (v)]/rho c(2))(1/(3 kappa))/c, where c is the speed of sound in the liquid, (R) over bar (max) the maximum bubble radius, rho the liquid density, (p) over bar (infinity) the hydrostatic pressure of the liquid, (p) over bar (v) the vapour pressure of the liquid and kappa the polytropic index of the bubble gas. Using the scalings for this short time scale, the radiated acoustic pressure scale has been deduced to be rho c(2)(R) over bar (max)([(p) over bar (infinity)-(p) over bar (v)]/rho c(2))(1/(3 kappa))/R, where R is the radial distance from the bubble centre to the point of measurement. The results are validated by comparison with experimental results.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据