4.6 Article

Structural models of mitochondrial uncoupling proteins obtained in DPC micelles are not functionally relevant

期刊

FEBS JOURNAL
卷 288, 期 9, 页码 3024-3033

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/febs.15629

关键词

brown adipose tissue; fatty acid‐ binding site; mitochondria; uncoupling protein 1

资金

  1. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
  2. 'Initiative d'Excellence' program from the French State (Grant 'DYNAMO') [ANR-11-LABEX-0011-01]
  3. Ministry of Research and Technology fellowship
  4. INSERM

向作者/读者索取更多资源

UCP1, found in brown adipocytes, increases proton conductance in the presence of long-chain fatty acids, leading to increased fatty acid oxidation and heat release. The proposed crucial amino acids for LCFA binding and UCP1 activation were found not relevant in a more physiological context. NMR titration experiments in DPC detergent did not accurately reflect UCP1 function.
Uncoupling protein 1 (UCP1) is found in the inner mitochondrial membrane of brown adipocytes. In the presence of long-chain fatty acids (LCFAs), UCP1 increases the proton conductance, which, in turn, increases fatty acid oxidation and energy release as heat. Atomic models of UCP1 and UCP2 have been generated based on the NMR backbone structure of UCP2 in dodecylphosphocholine (DPC), a detergent known to inactivate UCP1. Based on NMR titration experiments on UCP1 with LCFA, it has been proposed that K56 and K269 are crucial for LCFA binding and UCP1 activation. Given the numerous controversies on the use of DPC for structure-function analyses of membrane proteins, we revisited those UCP1 mutants in a more physiological context by expressing them in the mitochondria of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mitochondrial respiration, assayed on permeabilized spheroplasts, enables the determination of UCP1 activation and inhibition. The K56S, K269S, and K56S/K269S mutants did not display any default in activation, which shows that the NMR titration experiments in DPC detergent are not relevant to UCP1 function.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据