4.6 Review

Green nanomedicine: the path to the next generation of nanomaterials for diagnosing brain tumors and therapeutics?

期刊

EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG DELIVERY
卷 18, 期 6, 页码 715-736

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17425247.2021.1865306

关键词

Blood brain barrier (BBB); brain tumor; nanotechnology; nanomedicine; green synthesis; nanoparticles (NPs)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article discusses traditional methods for treating brain tumors and new solutions using nanotechnology, emphasizing green nanotechnology as a potential alternative. The limitations of green nanomaterials and potential ways to overcome them are also addressed.
Introduction: Current brain cancer treatments, based on radiotherapy and chemotherapy, are sometimes successful, but they are not free of drawbacks. Areas covered: Traditional methods for the treatment of brain tumors are discussed here with new solutions presented, among which the application of nanotechnology has demonstrated promising results over the past decade. The traditional synthesis of nanostructures, which relies on the use of physicochemical methodologies are discussed, and their associated concerns in terms of environmental and health impact due to the production of toxic by-products, need for toxic catalysts, and their lack of biocompatibility are presented. An overview of the current situation for treating brain tumors using nanotechnological-based approaches is introduced, and some of the latest advances in the application of green nanomaterials (NMs) for the effective targeting of brain tumors are presented. Expert opinion: Green nanotechnology is introduced as a potential solution to toxic NMs through the application of environmentally friendly and cost-effective protocols using living organisms and biomolecules. The current status of this field, such as those involving clinical trials, is included, and the possible limitations of green-NMs and potential ways to avoid those limitations are discussed so that the field can potentially evolve.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据