4.7 Article

3D printing of PLA composites scaffolds reinforced with keratin and chitosan: Effect of geometry and structure

期刊

EUROPEAN POLYMER JOURNAL
卷 141, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2020.110088

关键词

Polylactic acid; Chitosan; Keratin; Scaffolds; 3D printing; Tissue engineering

资金

  1. MATCORED (CONACYT)
  2. CONACYT
  3. [6042.19-P TECNM]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have used polylactic acid (PLA), keratin and chitosan to manufacture 3D printable polymer composite scaffolds. The effect of two different keratin reinforcements types, i.e., keratin in fibers and particles form are studied, and the size reduction in chitosan material. Specifically, the behaviour of two different keratin configurations i.e., alpha-helix (from hair) and predominantly beta-sheet (from chicken feathers) are used. The 3D printed composites are analysed by Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA). Finally, cytotoxicity assays and swelling tests are performed to analyse the possible application in tissue engineering. Different keratin and chitosan sizes and shapes analyses revealed that morphology is of paramount importance for thermomechanical and cellular growth. Achieving the best results with particle-like shaped rather than with fibre-like, and chitosan materials before of size reduction. For example, the storage modulus increases around 80-85% and the cell growth results increase approximately 81-85%. In addition, swelling tests in distilled water and simulated body fluid (SBF) reveal, particle size is also important to avoid excessive swelling in the composites. Thus, the results presented evidence about the impact of reinforcement size in the studied properties the feasibility of developing biodegradable polymer composites of completely natural sources and their application for bio-scaffolds supported by the versatility of additive manufacturing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据