4.7 Article

On the LHC signatures of SU(5)xU(1)′ F-theory motivated models

期刊

EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL C
卷 81, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-08794-y

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Union (European Social Fund-ESF) through the Operational Programme Human Resources Development, Education and Lifelong Learning 2014-2020 [MIS 5047638]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The low energy implications of F-theory GUT models based on SU(5) extended by a U(1)' symmetry were studied, with guaranteed rank-one fermion mass textures and a tree-level top quark coupling. Different models with various U(1)' charges of representations and possible extra zero modes were obtained, and the predictions of these models were compared with the results of LHC and other experiments. Specific cases interpreting the B-meson anomalies observed in LHCb and BaBar experiments were also discussed.
We study low energy implications of F-theory GUT models based on SU(5) extended by a U(1)' symmetry which couples non-universally to the three families of quarks and leptons. This gauge group arises naturally from the maximal exceptional gauge symmetry of an elliptically fibred internal space, at a single point of enhancement, E8 superset of SU(5)xSU(5)' superset of SU(5)xU(1)4. Rank-one fermion mass textures and a tree-level top quark coupling are guaranteed by imposing a Z2 monodromy group which identifies two abelian factors of the above breaking sequence. The U(1)' factor of the gauge symmetry is an anomaly free linear combination of the three remaining abelian symmetries left over by Z2. Several classes of models are obtained, distinguished with respect to the U(1)' charges of the representations, and possible extra zero modes coming in vector-like representations. The predictions of these models are investigated and are compared with the LHC results and other related experiments. Particular cases interpreting the B-meson anomalies observed in LHCb and BaBar experiments are also discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据