4.5 Article

Dual energy computed tomography evaluation of skeletal traumas

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY
卷 134, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109456

关键词

Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT); Computed tomography (CT); Trauma; Emergency radiology (ER); Musculoskeletal (MSK); Bone marrow edema (BME)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

DECT technology offers new post-processing applications for acute skeletal trauma imaging, including the generation of virtual non-calcium images, metal artifact reduction, and collagen mapping. These applications help in accurate diagnosis and prompt clinical decision, especially when magnetic resonance method is contraindicated.
Skeletal traumas are among the most common routine challenges faced by Emergency Radiologists, in particular in case of radiographically occult nondisplaced fractures or in case of soft tissue injuries. With the development of Dual Energy Computed Tomography (DECT) technology, new post-processing applications have gained a useful diagnostic role in many fields of musculoskeletal imaging including acute skeletal trauma imaging. In addition to conventional CT images, DECT allows for the generation of virtual calcium-suppressed images subtracting calcium from unenhanced CT images based on the fact that material attenuation varies at different energy levels. In this way, virtual-non-calcium (VNC) images can precisely characterize traumatic bone marrow edema in both axial and appendicular skeleton, facilitating prompt clinical decision, especially when magnetic resonance method is contraindicated or unavailable. Other DECT emerging applications in the trauma setting include metal artifact reduction and collagen mapping for the evaluation of injuries affecting ligament, tendon, and intervertebral disk. This review focuses on the basic principles of DECT and related post-processing algorithms, highlighting the current advantages and limitations of these new imaging advances in the Emergency Department related to skeletal traumas.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据