4.7 Article

Functional and druggability analysis of the SARS-CoV-2 proteome

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY
卷 890, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2020.173705

关键词

COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; Coronavirus; Druggability; Drug discovery; Binding hot-spots

资金

  1. National Agency for the Promotion of Science and Technology (ANPCyT) [PICT-2017-3767]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study focused on the binding hotspots analysis of the viral proteome of COVID-19, identifying potential druggable sites that could expand current drug discovery efforts. The hope is that these findings will aid in understanding the molecular determinants of the disease and broaden the repertoire of viral targets in the search for repurposed or novel drugs against COVID-19.
The infectious coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, appeared in December 2019 in Wuhan, China, and has spread worldwide. As of today, more than 46 million people have been infected and over 1.2 million fatalities. With the purpose of contributing to the development of effective therapeutics, we performed an in silica determination of binding hot-spots and an assessment of their druggability within the complete SARS-CoV-2 proteome. All structural, non-structural, and accessory proteins have been studied, and whenever experimental structural data of SARS-CoV-2 proteins were not available, homology models were built based on solved SARS-CoV structures. Several potential allosteric or protein-protein interaction druggable sites on different viral targets were identified, knowledge that could be used to expand current drug discovery endeavors beyond the currently explored cysteine proteases and the polymerase complex. It is our hope that this study will support the efforts of the scientific community both in understanding the molecular determinants of this disease and in widening the repertoire of viral targets in the quest for repurposed or novel drugs against COVID-19.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据