4.5 Article

Association between neonatal morbidities and head growth from birth until discharge in very-low-birthweight infants born preterm: a population-based study

期刊

DEVELOPMENTAL MEDICINE AND CHILD NEUROLOGY
卷 58, 期 11, 页码 1159-1166

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/dmcn.13153

关键词

-

资金

  1. Israel Centre for Disease Control
  2. Ministry of Health

向作者/读者索取更多资源

AimTo evaluate the possible association between major neonatal morbidities and poor head growth from birth to discharge home in very-low-birthweight (VLBW) infants born preterm. MethodPopulation-based observational study comprising 12 992 infants (6340 male, 6652 female) of 24 to 32 weeks' gestation, and birthweight 1500g. Severe head growth failure (HGF) was defined as a decrease in head circumference z-score >2 z-scores, and moderate HGF as a decrease of 1 to 2 z-scores. Multinomial logistic regression analysis was applied to determine morbidities associated with HGF. ResultsSevere HGF occurred in 4.5% and moderate HGF in 20.9% of infants. Each unit increase in head circumference z-score at birth was associated with increased odds for severe and moderate HGF (odds ratios [OR] 5.29, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 4.67-6.00, and OR 2.38, 95% CI 2.23-2.54 respectively). Both severe and moderate HGF were associated with respiratory distress syndrome (OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.58-2.62, and OR 1.66, 95% CI 1.48-1.85 respectively); bronchopulmonary dysplasia (OR 3.38, 95% CI 2.33-4.91, and OR 1.87, 95% CI 1.52-2.30 respectively); necrotizing enterocolitis (OR 2.89, 95% CI 2.04-4.09, and OR 1.72, 95% CI 1.38-2.16 respectively), and sepsis (OR 2.06, 95% CI 1.69-2.50, and OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.24-1.53 respectively). InterpretationMajor neonatal morbidities were associated with HGF in VLBW infants born preterm. Identification of whether this is a direct effect of these morbidities or mediated through nutritional or growth factors may enable interventions to improve postnatal head growth of infants born preterm.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据