4.7 Article

Market-based coordination of integrated electricity and natural gas systems under uncertain supply

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH
卷 287, 期 3, 页码 1105-1119

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2020.05.007

关键词

OR in energy; Bilevel programming; Integrated electricity and natural gas systems; Market-based coordination; Uncertainty

资金

  1. Danish Strategic Research Council (DSF) through CITIES project [1305-00027B/DSF]
  2. Danish Energy Technology Development and Demonstration Programme (EUDP) through the CORE project [64017-0005]
  3. Commission for Technology and Innovation of Switzerland [18801.1 PFIW-IW]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The interdependence between electricity and natural gas systems has lately increased due to the wide deployment of gas-fired power plants (GFPPs). Moreover, weather-driven renewables introduce uncertainty in the operation of the integrated energy system, increasing the need for operational flexibility. Recently proposed stochastic dispatch models optimally use the available flexibility and minimize the total expected system cost. However, these models are incompatible with the current sequential market design. We propose a novel method to optimally define the available natural gas volume for power production scheduling, anticipating the real-time flexibility needs. This volume-based model is formulated as a stochastic bilevel program that aims to enhance the inter-temporal coordination of scheduling and balancing operations, while remaining compatible with the sequential clearing of day-ahead and real-time markets. The proposed model accounts for the inherent flexibility of the natural gas system via the proper modeling of linepack capabilities and reduces the total expected system cost by the optimal definition of natural gas volume availability for GFPPs at the forward phase. The volume based coordination model is compared with a price based coordination alternative, which was recently proposed. In the latter one, the natural gas price perceived by GFPPs is similarly adjusted to enhance the temporal coordination of scheduling and balancing stages. This comparison enables us to highlight the main properties and differences between the two coordination mechanisms. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据