4.5 Article

Heterobimetallic Carbene Complexes Bearing Cyclometalated IrIII/RhIII and Mixed NHC∧Py/PPh3 Coordinated PdII Centers: Structures and Tandem Catalysis

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
卷 2021, 期 12, 页码 1104-1110

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/ejic.202001080

关键词

Carbene ligands; Heterobimetallic complexes; Structure elucidation; Tandem catalysis; Transfer hydrogenation

资金

  1. University Grants Commission (UGC)
  2. DST-SERB
  3. CAS V (University of Calcutta)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Heterobimetallic complexes with NHC donor ligands show promising catalytic activity and selectivity in tandem catalysis, making them potential candidates for various organic transformations.
Heterobimetallic complexes bearing NHC donor ligands are gaining immense popularity in organometallic chemistry and tandem catalysis. It is known that the NHC reacts with Pd-II in the presence of pyridine to yield PEPPSI type complexes and the NHC ligands having ortho-C-H proton easily orthometalate to Ir-III or Rh-III centers. Combining these two methodologies in a stepwise fashion, we present here a series of heterobimetallic Ir-III-Pd-II and Rh-III-Pd-II complexes from a dicarbene donor ligand featuring cyclometalated Ir-III or Rh-III and mixed NHC perpendicular to Py /PPh3 coordinated Pd-II centers. All the heterobimetallic complexes have been structurally characterized by X-ray crystallographic analysis. The heterobimetallic complexes featuring mixed NHC perpendicular to PPh3 coordinated Pd-II centers show better activity in tandem Suzuki-Miyaura/transfer hydrogenation reactions compared to both, the heterobimetallic complexes possessing PEPPSI type Pd(II)centers, and the equimolar mixture of their mononuclear Pd-II and Rh-III or Ir-III counterparts. The heterobimetallic complex featuring cyclometalated Ir-III and mixed NHC perpendicular to PPh3 coordinated Pd-II center shows excellent selectivity for 4-biphenylmethanol (isolated yield: 92 %) in tandem catalysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据