4.5 Review

Regulatory T cell targeting in cancer: Emerging strategies in immunotherapy

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 51, 期 2, 页码 280-291

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/eji.202048992

关键词

Cancer; Immunotherapy; Regulatory T cells; Specificity; Tumor microenvironment

资金

  1. Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson Johnson

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Treg cells play a crucial role in maintaining immune homeostasis, and targeting them can enhance antitumor immunity, although the efficacy of current Treg therapies in clinical settings is limited due to lack of specificity. Novel approaches, such as T-cell receptor mimic antibodies and near-infrared photoimmunotherapy, aim to address this limitation in the context of cancer.
The adaptive immune system is modulated by an important subset of CD4(+) T lymphocytes called Treg cells that function in maintaining immune homeostasis by preventing excessive immune activation. Both deficiency and overactivation of Treg cell function can result in disease pathology. While loss of Treg function can lead to autoimmunity, an overabundance of Treg activity can promote tumorigenesis. Blocking and/or depleting Tregs has emerged as a viable strategy to enhance antitumor immunity. A major limitation underlying the limited efficacy observed with Treg therapies in the clinic is lack of selective targeting, often attributed to concurrent depletion of antitumor effector T-cell populations. Novel approaches to improve the specificity of Treg targeting in the context of cancer include the use of T-cell receptor mimic antibodies, bispecific antibodies, and near-infrared photoimmunotherapy. Next-generation technology platforms and transcriptomic/computational-based screening methods have been recently developed to identify preferential Treg targets. Herein, we highlight key advancements and challenges pertaining to the development of novel Treg targeting cancer therapeutics and discuss ongoing clinical trials evaluating next-generation Treg therapies for solid tumors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据