4.6 Article

Diagnostic accuracy of infrared thermal imaging for detecting COVID-19 infection in minimally symptomatic patients

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/eci.13474

关键词

COVID-19; diagnosis; machine learning; screening; thermography

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study indicates that temperature asymmetry between the lacrimal caruncles and the forehead can be an important indicator in the diagnosis of COVID-19 suspected cases, with potential clinical application value.
Introduction Despite being widely used as a screening tool, a rigorous scientific evaluation of infrared thermography for the diagnosis of minimally symptomatic patients suspected of having COVID-19 infection has not been performed. Methods A consecutive sample of 60 adult individuals with a history of close contact with COVID-19 infected individuals and mild respiratory symptoms for less than 7 days and 20 confirmed COVID-19 negative healthy volunteers were enrolled in the study. Infrared thermograms of the face were obtained with a mobile camera, and RT-PCR was used as the reference standard test to diagnose COVID-19 infection. Temperature values and distribution of the face of healthy volunteers and patients with and without COVID-19 infection were then compared. Results Thirty-four patients had an RT-PCR confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 and 26 had negative test results. The temperature asymmetry between the lacrimal caruncles and the forehead was significantly higher in COVID-19 positive individuals. Through a random forest analysis, a cut-off value of 0.55 degrees C was found to discriminate with an 82% accuracy between patients with and without COVID-19 confirmed infection. Conclusions Among adults with a history of COVID-19 exposure and mild respiratory symptoms, a temperature asymmetry of >= 0.55 degrees C between the lacrimal caruncle and the forehead is highly suggestive of COVID-19 infection. This finding questions the widespread use of the measurement of absolute temperature values of the forehead as a COVID-19 screening tool.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据