4.4 Article

Ultrasound-guided versus conventional lung recruitment manoeuvres in laparoscopic gynaecological surgery A randomised controlled trial

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY
卷 38, 期 3, 页码 275-284

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001435

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study aimed to investigate whether lung ultrasound-guided alveolar recruitment manoeuvres could reduce peri-operative atelectasis during laparoscopic gynaecological surgery. The results showed that using ultrasound-guided recruitment manoeuvres can improve lung aeration during surgery and have persistent effects in the postanaesthesia care unit.
BACKGROUND Pneumoperitoneum and steep Trendelenburg position promote the formation of pulmonary atelectasis during laparoscopic gynaecological surgery. OBJECTIVE To determine whether lung ultrasound-guided alveolar recruitment manoeuvres could reduce peri-operative atelectasis compared with conventional recruitment manoeuvres during laparoscopic gynaecological surgery. DESIGN Randomised controlled trial. SETTING Tertiary hospital, Republic of Korea, from August 2018 to January 2019. PATIENTS Adult patients scheduled for laparoscopic gynaecological surgery under general anaesthesia. INTERVENTION Forty patients were randomised to receive either ultrasound-guided recruitment manoeuvres (manual inflation until no visibly collapsed area was seen with lung ultrasonography; intervention group) or conventional recruitment manoeuvres (single manual inflation with 30 cmH(2)O pressure; control group). Recruitment manoeuvres were performed 5 min after induction and at the end of surgery in both groups. All patients received volume-controlled ventilation with a tidal volume of 8 ml kg(-1) and a positive end-expiratory pressure of 5 cmH(2)O. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was the lung ultrasound score at the end of surgery; a higher score indicates worse lung aeration. RESULTS Lung ultrasound scores at the end of surgery were significantly lower in the intervention group compared with control group (median [IQR], 7.5 [6.5 to 8.5] versus 9.5 [8.5 to 13.5]; difference, -2 [95% CI, -4.5 to -1]; P = 0.008). The intergroup difference persisted in the postanaesthesia care unit (7 [5 to 8.8] versus 10 [7.3 to 12.8]; difference, -3 [95% CI, -5.5 to -1.5]; P = 0.005). The incidence of atelectasis was lower in the intervention group compared with control group at the end of surgery (35 versus 80%; P = 0.010) but was comparable in the postanaesthesia care unit (40 versus 55%; P = 0.527). CONCLUSIONS The use of ultrasound-guided recruitment manoeuvres improves peri-operative lung aeration; these effects may persist in the postanaesthesia care unit. However, the long-term effects of ultrasound-guided recruitment manoeuvres on clinical outcomes should be the subject of future trials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据