4.5 Article

Auditory performance in a group of elderly patients after cochlear implantation

期刊

EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY
卷 278, 期 11, 页码 4295-4303

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00405-020-06566-8

关键词

Cochlear implantation; Elderly; Speech perception; Ageing

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that elderly cochlear implant recipients showed significant improvement in monosyllabic word recognition test performance after implantation, with a negative correlation between auditory performance and age. Differences in performance were also significant between different age groups and genders in the study.
Purpose The retrospective case review investigated the effect of cochlear implantation in subjects aged 61 years or older with respect to their auditory performance. The study also analysed the effect of age on the performance, and it drew a comparison between the outcomes of older and younger adults. Methods The outcome in a group of 446 patients aged 61 to 89 years at the time of unilateral cochlear implantation was compared with the outcome in a group of 110 patients aged 17 to 42 years. Auditory performance was measured with open-set monosyllabic word testing and sentences in quiet and in noise. Results In the monosyllabic word recognition test, the group of older adults performed significantly better after cochlear implantation compared with their scores prior to implantation (p < 0.001; r = 0.59). Their auditory performance correlated negatively with their age. However, the correlation was of small strength. Significant differences in auditory performance were detected between sexagenarians and octogenarians (p < 0.001; r = 0.27). Additionally, a statistically significant difference was revealed between the groups of older and younger adults in the monosyllabic word test (p = 0.001; r = 0.15). Conclusion Elderly cochlear implant recipients can benefit significantly from cochlear implantation. Although higher age correlates negatively with auditory performance, its influence in the presented sample is small.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据