4.5 Article

Systematic analysis and comparison of commercial seizure-detection software

期刊

EPILEPSIA
卷 62, 期 2, 页码 426-438

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/epi.16812

关键词

epilepsy; seizure detection; video-EEG

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study compared three commercially available seizure-detection software packages (Besa, Encevis, Persyst) in 81 epilepsy patients undergoing long-term video-EEG monitoring. While all three packages showed similar sensitivities in detecting seizures, they differed in false alarm rates and detection delays. Persyst 13 had the highest detection rate and false alarm rate with the shortest detection delay, while Encevis 1.7 had slightly lower sensitivity, the lowest false alarm rate, and longer detection delay.
Objective: To determine if three different commercially available seizure-detection software packages (Besa 2.0, Encevis 1.7, and Persyst 13) accurately detect seizures with high sensitivity, high specificity, and short detection delay in epilepsy patients undergoing long-term video-electroencephalography (EEG) monitoring (VEM). Methods: Comparison of sensitivity (detection rate), specificity (false alarm rate), and detection delay of three commercially available seizure-detection software packages in 81 randomly selected patients with epilepsy undergoing long-term VEM. Results: Detection rates on a per-patient basis were not significantly different between Besa (mean 67.6%, range 0-100%), Encevis (77.8%, 0-100%) and Persyst (81%, 0-100%; P = .059). False alarm rate (per hour) was significantly different between Besa (mean 0.7/h, range 0.01-6.2/h), Encevis (0.2/h, 0.01-0.5/h), and Persyst (0.9/h, 0.04-6.5/h; P < .001). Detection delay was significantly different between Besa (mean 30 s, range 0-431 s), Encevis (25 s, 2-163 s), and Persyst (20 s, 0-167 s; P = .007). Kappa statistics showed moderate to substantial agreement between the reference standard and each seizure-detection software (Besa: 0.47, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.36-0.59; Encevis: 0.59, 95% CI 0.47-0.7; Persyst: 0.63, 95% CI 0.51-0.74). Significance: Three commercially available seizure-detection software packages showed similar, reasonable sensitivities on the same data set, but differed in false alarm rates and detection delay. Persyst 13 showed the highest detection rate and false alarm rate with the shortest detection delay, whereas Encevis 1.7 had a slightly lower sensitivity, the lowest false alarm rate, and longer detection delay.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据