4.8 Article

Stable Isotope Insights into Microplastic Contamination within Freshwater Food Webs

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 55, 期 2, 页码 1024-1035

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.0c06221

关键词

-

资金

  1. Agence de l'Eau Adour-Garonne (PLASTIGAR project)
  2. Region Midi-Pyrenees

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A study in the Garonne river found that the abundance of ingested microplastics differed between macroinvertebrates and fish, and was not significantly related to microplastic pollution. The characteristics of microplastics also varied between abiotic and biotic compartments.
Microplastic pollution and ingestion are ubiquitous phenomena in freshwater ecosystems. However, our understanding of the role of trophic niche in microplastic ingestion is still limited. Here, we quantified the level of microplastic (700 mu m to 5 mm) contamination for macroinvertebrates and fish within the Garonne river. We then used stable isotope analyses (delta C-13 and (delta N-15) to quantify trophic niches. We first demonstrated that the abundance of ingested microplastics differed between macroinvertebrates and fish and was not significantly related to microplastic pollution. We then found that microplastic characteristics (shape, color, size, and polymer composition) differ between the abiotic (surface waters and sediments) and biotic (ingested by macroinvertebrates and fish) compartments. The abundance of ingested microplastics increased with the size of organisms in both fish and macroinvertebrates and tended to increase with trophic position in macroinvertebrates only. Finally, the origin of the resources consumed by fish significantly affected the abundance of microplastics ingested. Altogether, these results suggest the absence of microplastic bioaccumulation in freshwater food webs and the dominance of direct consumption, most likely accidentally. The use of stable isotope analyses is therefore crucial to improve our understanding of microplastic ingestion by wild organisms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据