4.8 Article

Duet Fe3C and FeNx Sites for H2O2 Generation and Activation toward Enhanced Electro-Fenton Performance in Wastewater Treatment

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 55, 期 2, 页码 1260-1269

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.0c06825

关键词

electro-Fenton; heterogeneous Fenton; FeNx sites; H2O2; Fe3C particles; electrochemical catalysis

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [NSFC21477165]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  3. South-Central University for Nationalities [CZP20005, CZQ17004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Fe-based catalyst with core-shell structure showed significant performance in degrading chlorophenols under various conditions while maintaining low levels of leached iron. Experimental results confirmed center dot OH as the key reactive species, with Fe-IV playing a role in neutral conditions.
Heterogeneous electro-Fenton (HEF) reaction has been considered as a promising process for real effluent treatments. However, the design of effective catalysts for simultaneous H2O2 generation and activation to achieve bifunctional catalysis for O-2 toward center dot OH production remains a challenge. Herein, a core-shell structural Fe-based catalyst (FeNC@C), with Fe3C and FeN nanoparticles encapsulated by porous graphitic layers, was synthesized and employed in a HEF system. The FeNC@C catalyst presented a significant performance in degradation of various chlorophenols at various conditions with an extremely low level of leached iron. Electron spin resonance and radical scavenging revealed that center dot OH was the key reactive species and Fe-IV would play a role at neutral conditions. Experimental and density function theory calculation revealed the dominated role of Fe3C in H2O2 generation and the positive effect of FeNx sites on H2O2 activation to form center dot OH. Meanwhile, FeNC@C was proved to be less pH dependence, high stability, and well-recycled materials for practical application in wastewater purification.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据