4.3 Review

Geochemical tracers in submarine groundwater discharge research: practice and challenges from a view of climate changes

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS
卷 29, 期 2, 页码 242-259

出版社

CANADIAN SCIENCE PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1139/er-2020-0093

关键词

coastal zone; climate changes; geochemical tracers; submarine groundwater discharge; subterranean estuary

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41706081, 41530960]
  2. Scientific Research Foundation of SKLEC [2017RCDW04]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Submarine groundwater discharge is an important mechanism for delivering land-borne solutes to coastal oceans, but it may also pose challenges such as eutrophication and harmful algae blooms. Geophysical and geochemical tracers play key roles in studying SGD, but there are still challenges to be addressed. It is necessary to combine different tracer methods to study the impacts of factors like climate change on SGD.
Submarine groundwater discharge (SGD), the flux of porewater from permeable seabed or karst conduits to surface water bodies, delivers a significant quantity of land-borne solutes to coastal oceans. This input of land-derived solutes is frequently linked with eutrophication, harmful algae blooms, and benthic hypoxia, and hence has the potential to trigger great economic losses. Geophysical and geochemical tracers, including salinity, temperature, water stable isotopes, and radioactive elements, have been widely applied in SGD studies for more than 50 years to, amongst others, identify water sources, estimate residence times, and quantify discharge rates. Here we review advantages and shortcomings of these tracers in the study of SGD. Application requirements are outlined based on previous research and combined tracer approaches in karst environments, permeable coasts, and estuaries are illustrated under the view of climate changes. Current challenges with the use of geochemical tracers in SGD studies are highlighted and opportunities to develop these tracers for improved coastal management showcased.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据