4.7 Article

Numerical modelling of birch pollen dispersion in Canada

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH
卷 194, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.110554

关键词

Birch pollen; Betula; Numerical simulation; Air pollutants; Atmospheric dispersion

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study simulated allergenic tree pollen distribution using a regional air quality model, showing superior results compared to other methods and identifying the majority of Betula pollen originating from the Laurentides region. Additionally, birch pollen episodes in Montreal were found to occur only within a specific average daily temperature range.
Simulating allergenic tree pollen is important to protect sensitive population and to support bioaerosols monitoring effort. Using the regional air quality model GEM-MACH, a simulation was conducted adopting two new main hypotheses: 1) the use of vertical correlation concept to force the vertical dispersion (a method normally used in tracer data assimilation) and, 2) the use of a puff instead of a continuous pollen release. The simulation was compared with pollen observations in Montreal and with the corresponding statistical forecasts (issued daily by the Weather Network) at several locations in the province of Quebec and elsewhere. The comparison with the simulation was found satisfactory (outperform forecasts based on persistence or pollen calendar and is also superior to numerical simulation of tree pollen done elsewhere in North America). Simulation shows that, for the 2012 pollen season, the majority (88%) of the Betula pollen measured in Montreal originated from the Laurentides region. Another result of scientific importance obtained here is that Betula pollen episodes (observed or simulated birch pollen) in Montreal occur only when the average daily temperature is in the range of 10 degrees to 18 degrees C. This research is considered as a first step in forecasting bioaerosols in Canada within an air quality model.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据