4.5 Article

Acid mine drainage at the Bahia Gold Belt (Brazil): microbial isolation and characterization

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10661-021-08844-2

关键词

Acid mine drainage; Gold mine; Tailings dam; pyrite

资金

  1. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (PNPD/CAPES)
  2. ConselhoNacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study aims to identify microorganisms involved in sulfide oxidation in the tailings of a Bahia Gold Belt mine in Brazil. Five bacterium species were found, including Acidithiobacillus spp., Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans, Acidiphilium spp., Leptospirillum type II, and Sulfobacillus spp. Molecular analysis was used to determine the role of these microorganisms in the acid mine drainage process.
Acid mine drainage occurs due to the chemical and microbiological oxidation of sulfide minerals and can be a source of potentially toxic elements contamination of groundwater and surface water. The objective of this study was to identify microorganisms involved in sulfide oxidation in the tailings of a Bahia Gold Belt mine (Brazil). Samples of solids and water were collected at the mine tailings dam and characterized. The microorganisms were isolated after enrichment and subsequent purification. The major constituents of the tailings are Si, Fe, Al, S, and K. The sulfur content of the tailings is 0.98%. The major phases are quartz, muscovite, and clinochlore. Gravity concentrates of the tailings show several particles of pyrite, that is, the major sulfide phase. Molecular analysis identified the microorganisms isolated in the acid mine drainage process in this region. Five bacterium species were found: Acidithiobacillus spp., Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans, Acidiphilium spp., Leptospirillum type II, and Sulfobacillus spp. No organisms of the archaea or eukaryote domains were found. The isolate was used in the bioleaching of copper sulfide ore, and the copper extraction was about 60% in 60 days for ground ore.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据