4.5 Article

Effects of cyclone Fani on the copepod community of the Ganges River estuary of India

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10661-020-08732-1

关键词

Diversity; Abundance; Dominance; Community recovery; Sundarban

资金

  1. DST INSPIRE Faculty Award [DST/INSPIRE/04/2016/0000036]
  2. Science and Engineering Research Board of the Government of India [EMR/2017/001111]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A cyclone temporarily disrupts copepod community structure of an estuary, and during the community rebuilding process, omnivorous copepods dominate. This hypothesis was tested after cyclone Fani affected the Ganges River estuary of India on 5 May 2019. Copepod assemblages and environmental parameters were collected before (25 February 2019), after (24 August 2019) and immediately after (daily between 8 and 14 May 2019) cyclone Fani from three sites of the estuary. Immediately after cyclone Fani, spatial heterogeneity of the estuarine environment was washed away, salinity and temperature levels of the estuary increased, pH level declined, while the total dissolve solids remained constant at high levels of concentration. Copepod diversity and abundance were drastically reduced by cyclone Fani with the exception of the omnivorous Bestiolina similis, which tolerated a wide variability of the environment and dominated the community. Led by small and medium-sized copepods, within days, the community recovered from its initial disruption. Immediately after cyclone Fani, medium-sized omnivorous copepod Acartiella tortaniformis became the second most abundant species replacing the small-sized herbivorous Paracalanus parvus. Changes in species composition and abundance hierarchy observed immediately after cyclone Fani lasted for a few months. The intensity of cyclones is increasing in the Indian Sundarban; therefore, following a cyclone, more severe and prolong disruptions of the copepod community are likely. Institutionalized monitoring of the cyclone-mediated ecological changes of the Ganges River estuary is therefore strongly recommended.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据