4.6 Article

Hydrogeophysical investigation at El Moghra Area, North Western Desert, Egypt

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES
卷 80, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12665-020-09332-5

关键词

Geoelectric method; Geophysical borehole logging; Pumping test; Chemical analyses; Moghra; Aquifer

资金

  1. Science and Technology Development Fund (STDF), Egypt [15239]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The El Moghra area in the western desert of Egypt is part of a national reclamation project that relies on the local El Moghra Formation as its main aquifer. The region has good soil suitable for agricultural development. The subsurface stratigraphy consists of six geo-electrical units, with the main aquifer represented by the fourth and sixth units intercalated with a clay unit.
El Moghra area, in the western desert of Egypt, is an important part of the national reclamation project (1.5 million acres-6.07 x 10(9) m(2)), which depends on the groundwater of El Moghra Formation (MF), the main aquifer in this area. Moghra Oasis and its surroundings are characterized by vast areas of good soil, which are favorable for agricultural development. In this respect, ambitious plans and successful programs are urgently required. Thirty-one vertical electrical sounding stations (VES's) were measured in El Moghra. The results of quantitative interpretation of such stations and well logging data indicate that the subsurface stratigraphy of the investigated area consists of six geo-electrical units where the main aquifer is represented by the fourth and sixth units intercalated with a clay unit (fifth unit). Thirteen boreholes of depth reaching 200 m are drilled in the study area. The hydrochemical analyses for collected samples indicate that the salinity of the groundwater in the Moghra area increases with depth. The result of the pumping test for boreholes indicates that the efficiency of the wells is ranging from 65 to 96% of the average value of 84.5%. The aquifer has transmissivity which represents a highly potential aquifer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据