4.2 Review

Exogenous exposure to dihydroxyacetone mimics high fructose induced oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL AND MOLECULAR MUTAGENESIS
卷 62, 期 3, 页码 185-202

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/em.22425

关键词

dihydroxyacetone; fructose; glucose; inflammation; metabolic dysfunction; mitochondria; mitochondrial DNA; reactive oxygen species; reactive species

资金

  1. National Institute of Health [AT009908, ES032450]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

DHA is a three-carbon sugar found in sunless tanning products and e-cigarettes, with potential health risks including metabolic imbalance and cellular stress. Exposures to DHA mimic effects of fructose exposure, highlighting the need for further investigation into the health consequences of DHA exposure.
Dihydroxyacetone (DHA) is a three-carbon sugar that is the active ingredient in sunless tanning products and a by-product of electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) combustion. Increased use of sunless tanning products and e-cigarettes has elevated exposures to DHA through inhalation and absorption. Studies have confirmed that DHA is rapidly absorbed into cells and can enter into metabolic pathways following phosphorylation to dihydroxyacetone phosphate (DHAP), a product of fructose metabolism. Recent reports have suggested metabolic imbalance and cellular stress results from DHA exposures. However, the impact of elevated exposure to DHA on human health is currently under-investigated. We propose that exogenous exposures to DHA increase DHAP levels in cells and mimic fructose exposures to produce oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, and gene and protein expression changes. Here, we review cell line and animal model exposures to fructose to highlight similarities in the effects produced by exogenous exposures to DHA. Given the long-term health consequences of fructose exposure, this review emphasizes the pressing need to further examine DHA exposures from sunless tanning products and e-cigarettes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据