4.7 Article

Mechanical performance of CFRP-confined sustainable geopolymeric recycled concrete under axial compression

期刊

ENGINEERING STRUCTURES
卷 224, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111246

关键词

Geopolymeric recycled concrete; Confinement; Carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP); Compressive behavior; Prediction model

资金

  1. Australian Research Council (ARC) [DE150101751, DP200100057, IH150100006]
  2. University of Technology Sydney Research Academic Program at Tech Lab (UTS RAPT)
  3. University of Technology Sydney Tech Lab Blue Sky Research Scheme

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sustainable geopolymeric recycled aggregate concrete (RAC) by utilizing environmentally-friendly binder-geopolymer and constructional solid waste-recycled aggregate (RA) will facilitate the sustainability in concrete industry. This study investigated the compressive behavior of sustainable geopolymeric RAC confined by carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) jackets. A total of 72 cylindrical fly ash/slag-based geopolymeric concrete specimens, including 48 CFRP-confined specimens and 24 unconfined specimens were fabricated and tested. The testing variables included: coarse aggregate type (i.e., natural aggregate and RA), thickness of CFRP jackets (i.e., 1, 2, and 3 layers) and (iii) slag content (i.e., 0, 10%, 20% and 30% of the total binder by mass). The results indicate that the CFRP confinement remarkably enhances the compressive strength and ultimate strain of geopolymeric concrete, and the enhancement is more pronounced with the increase of CFRP jacket thickness. Moreover, the RA replacement and the inclusion of slag have minor influences on the CFRP confinement performance for the compressive strength, but have obvious effects on the CFRP confinement performance for the ultimate axial strain. Based on the test results, empirical stress and strain models were proposed to predict the ultimate condition of the CFRP-confined geopolymeric concrete.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据