4.5 Article

Parameter optimization of toroidal tuned liquid column dampers for suppressing multi-directional harmonic vibration of structures

期刊

ENGINEERING OPTIMIZATION
卷 54, 期 1, 页码 1-19

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/0305215X.2020.1849174

关键词

Toroidal tuned liquid column damper; multi-directional vibration control; parameter optimization; harmonic vibration; closed-form solution

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51639006, 51725901]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article investigates the optimization of the toroidal tuned liquid column damper (TTLCD) for suppressing harmonic vibration. The closed-form solution for the TTLCD-structure system is derived, and based on this solution, optimization is carried out to obtain design tables with optimum parameters. The study also performs a parametric investigation of key parameters affecting the damping properties of the TTLCD-structure system, revealing how to produce optimal damping effects. Additionally, a design example of the TTLCD is illustrated and compared to a traditional TLCD.
In this article, optimization of the toroidal tuned liquid column damper (TTLCD) for suppressing harmonic vibration is investigated. First, a closed-form solution for the TTLCD-structure system is derived. Based on the solution, optimization is carried out and some design tables listing the optimum parameters are obtained. Secondly, a parametric investigation of key parameters that affect the damping properties of the TTLCD-structure system is performed to reveal how to produce optimal damping effects. Finally, a design example of the TTLCD is illustrated. A conventional TLCD is also designed based on the same controlled structure for comparison. The results reveal that the TTLCD can maintain the equivalent damping ratio of the system at a high level in arbitrary directions, while the TLCD has a high damping ratio in its main control direction but falls significantly in the direction perpendicular to its main control direction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据