4.3 Article

Implementation of QbD strategies in the inoculum expansion of a mAb production process

期刊

ENGINEERING IN LIFE SCIENCES
卷 21, 期 3-4, 页码 196-207

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/elsc.202000056

关键词

CHO; inoculum expansion; mAb; PAT; QbD

资金

  1. Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung [031B0475I, 031B0744]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The quality by design approach is widely used in monoclonal antibody production processes, but early process phases have not been thoroughly investigated. Through risk assessment and design of experiments, interactions between key parameters in the early process were identified and a design space was established.
The quality by design approach was introduced to the biopharmaceutical industry over 15 years ago. This principle is widely implemented in the characterization of monoclonal antibody production processes. Anyway, the early process phase, namely the inoculum expansion, was not yet investigated and characterized for most processes. In order to increase the understanding of early process parameter interactions and their influence on the later production process, a risk assessment followed by a design of experiments approach was conducted. The DoE included the critical parameters methotrexate (MTX) concentration, initial passage viable cell density and passage duration. Multivariate data analysis led to mathematical regression models and the establishment of a designated design space for the studied parameters. It was found that the passage duration as well as the initial viable cell density for each passage during the inoculum expansion have severe effects on the growth rate and viability of the early process phase. Furthermore, the variations during the inoculum expansion directly influenced the production process responses. This carry-over of factor effects highlights the crucial impact of early process failures and the importance of process analysis and control during the first part of mAb production processes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据