4.7 Article

Causal artificial neural network and its applications in engineering design

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.engappai.2020.104089

关键词

Artificial Neural Network; Causal graph; Bayesian Network; Engineering design

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To reduce computational costs in engineering design, a novel metamodel called causal artificial neural network (causal-ANN) is developed in this paper, which leverages cause-effect relations and intermediate variables to train sub-networks and improve accuracy. By utilizing the structure of the causal-ANN and Bayesian Networks theory, attractive design subspaces can be identified.
To reduce the computational cost in engineering design, expensive high-fidelity simulation models are approximated by mathematical models, named as metamodels. Typical metamodeling methods assume that expensive simulation models are black-box functions. In this paper, in order to improve the accuracy of metamodels and reduce the cost of building metamodels, knowledge about engineering design problems is employed to help develop a novel metamodel, named as causal artificial neural network (causal-ANN). Cause- effect relations intrinsic to the design problem are employed to decompose an ANN into sub-networks and values of intermediate variables are utilized to train these sub-networks. By involving knowledge of the design problem, the accuracy of causal-ANN is higher than the traditional metamodeling methods that assume black box functions. Additionally, one can identify attractive subspaces from the causal-ANN by leveraging the structure of the causal-ANN and the theory of Bayesian Networks. The impacts of fidelity of causal graphs and design variable correlations are also discussed in the paper. The engineering case studies demonstrate that the causal-ANN can be accurately constructed with a small number of expensive simulations, and attractive design subspaces can be identified directly from the causal-ANN.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据