4.6 Article

The zebrafish galectins Drgal1-L2 and Drgal3-L1 bind in vitro to the infectious hematopoietic necrosis virus (IHNV) glycoprotein and reduce viral adhesion to fish epithelial cells

期刊

DEVELOPMENTAL AND COMPARATIVE IMMUNOLOGY
卷 55, 期 -, 页码 241-252

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.dci.2015.09.007

关键词

Infectious hematopoietic necrosis virus (IHNV); Zebrafish; Epithelial cells; Galectin; Viral adhesion; IHNV envelope glycoprotein

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01 GM070589-01, 5T32AI095190-03, 5T32A195190-02]
  2. Department of Biotechnology, New Delhi, India
  3. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/K016164/1, BB/F008309/1]
  4. Wellcome Trust Senior Investigator Award
  5. BBSRC [BB/F008309/1, BB/K016164/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/K016164/1, BB/F008309/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The infectious hematopoietic necrosis virus (IHNV; Rhabdoviridae, Novirhabdovirus) infects teleost fish, such as salmon and trout, and is responsible for significant losses in the aquaculture industry and in wild fish populations. Although IHNV enters the host through the skin at the base of the fins, the viral adhesion and entry mechanisms are not fully understood. In recent years, evidence has accumulated in support of the key roles played by protein-carbohydrate interactions between host lectins secreted to the extracellular space and virion envelope glycoproteins in modulating viral adhesion and infectivity. In this study, we assessed in vitro the potential role(s) of zebrafish (Danio rerio) proto type galectin-1 (Drgal1-L2) and a chimera galectin-3 (Drgal3-L1) in IHNV adhesion to epithelial cells. Our results suggest that the extracellular Drgal1-L2 and Drgal3-L1 interact directly and in a carbohydrate-dependent manner with the IHNV glycosylated envelope and glycans on the epithelial cell surface, significantly reducing viral adhesion. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据