期刊
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS
卷 235, 期 -, 页码 -出版社
ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.110736
关键词
School electricity; School lights; Energy usage; Smart meter; School energy profiles; LED lights; Efficiency improvement; Energy saving
资金
- MTN South Africa through the MTN Mobile Intelligence Lab, Stellenbosch University Social Impact
- Eskom
South Africa's private sector has been implementing energy-saving mechanisms, while the public sector faces misplaced incentives hindering the adoption of energy-efficient technology. With falling LED lighting costs and rising electricity prices, the conversion is becoming more cost-effective. The education sector is a promising test case, where savings from utilities can enhance value-adding services in schools, although the cost-benefit of replacements and decision-making options may present challenges.
South Africa's private sector - under significant pressure to become energy efficient and employ sustain ability principles - has long been implementing energy-saving mechanisms. Unfortunately, there seems to exist many misplaced incentives in South Africa's public sector that prevent it from embracing energy efficient technology. With the falling cost of LED lighting and the rising cost of electricity, however, conversions are increasingly cost-efficient. Effecting these changes are increasingly urgent given the national utility-imposed rolling blackouts and climate change concerns. The primary education sector is a particularly attractive test case, since money saved on utilities can be allocated to desperately needed value adding services in schools. From a technical perspective, however, the cost-benefit of replacements and the range of options facing decision-makers could be overwhelming. To assess the impact of replacing fluorescent lights with LED lights at schools in South Africa, we propose a model that draws on smart metering data, a bench-test assessment of available LED lights and tariff rates. The model was validated with field tests at three schools and used to assess the impact at seven local schools. The results show that the setup cost differs substantially from the life-cycle cost, and that buying the cheapest lights could prove to be the costliest decision over the light's life cycle. The results also show that lights contribute from 31% to 57% of electricity expenditure, and that monetary savings of 21% to 39% are achievable by replacing fluorescent tubes with the most efficient LED lighting option available. (c) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据