4.7 Article

Energy performance prediction of vapor-injection air source heat pumps in residential buildings using a neural network model

期刊

ENERGY AND BUILDINGS
卷 228, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110499

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key Research & Development Program of China [2016YFC0700300]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Vapor injection is a relative new technique used on air source heat pumps to enhance the coefficient of performance under low outdoor temperatures. The new system - vapor-injection air source heat pump (VIASHP) - has received rather limited research in the past, especially in numerical studies. Therefore, this paper presents a Bayesian regularized neural network model for predicting the energy performance of VIASHPs operating in residential buildings. The model is trained and validated by on-site measured data which is collected in 1-minute interval from two random selected residential buildings over 4 - months. A global sensitivity analysis of the measured data is conducted to identify the more important parameters as network inputs. We also process the measured data into 5-minute, 10-minute, 30-minute, 1-hour, 2-hour, 1-day and 1.5-day intervals to study the impacts of temporal resolution, time delay and number of hidden neurons on model prediction accuracy. The results show good agreement between measured data and neural network modeled data. Following findings are obtained in the two residential buildings: (1) lower temporal resolution and time delay can improve the prediction performance. However, (2) with the decrease of temporal resolution, the positive impact of time delay is declining. (3) when the temporal resolution is daily, best prediction performance can be achieved when no time delay is implemented. (4) Increasing the number of hidden neurons can improve the prediction performance for high temporal resolution, but deteriorate it for low temporal resolution. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据