4.7 Article

Evaluation of Silica and Related Matrix Ion Effects on Common Scale Inhibitors

期刊

ENERGY & FUELS
卷 35, 期 3, 页码 2144-2152

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c03768

关键词

-

资金

  1. Rice University
  2. Aegis
  3. Apache
  4. BHGE
  5. BWA
  6. Chevron
  7. ConocoPhillips
  8. Coastal Chemical
  9. EOG Resources
  10. ExxonMobil
  11. Flotek Industries
  12. Halliburton
  13. Hess
  14. Italmatch
  15. JACAM
  16. Kemira
  17. Kinder Morgan
  18. Nalco
  19. Oasis
  20. Occidental Oil and Gas
  21. Range Resources
  22. RSI
  23. Saudi Aramco
  24. Schlumberger
  25. Shell
  26. SNF
  27. Statoil
  28. Suez
  29. Total
  30. NSF Nanosystems Engineering Research Center for Nanotechnology-Enabled Water Treatment [ERC-1449500]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the effects of silica and divalent ion silicate on common scale inhibitors, revealing no significant impact on the crystallization or inhibition efficiency of polymeric inhibitors for barite. High concentrations of Ca2+, Mg2+, and Fe2+ ions were found to have detrimental impacts on phosphonate inhibitors, with Fe(II) silicate interactions helping to partially recover these impacts on DTPMP. The mechanism of Fe(II) silicate influence was explained by the competition between Fe2+ forms and DTPMP, providing valuable insights for oilfield scale management.
Scale inhibitors have been widely used to solve the mineral scale problems in various energy industries. The performances of scale inhibitors are influenced by different species (such as ion or chemical species) in the produced water. Silica species, one of the most ubiquitous species in the produced water, are present either by the form of silicic acid or divalent ion silicate complex/interactions (e.g., Ca,Mg silicate and Fe(II) silicate). Their impacts on common scale inhibitor performance, however, have not been systematically studied. In this study, the effects of silica and the related divalent ion silicate on the several common scale inhibitors were investigated by examining the crystallization and inhibition kinetics of barite. The results show that the presence of silica or divalent ion silicate does not show a significant effect on barite crystallization or inhibition efficiency of the polymeric inhibitors. The presence of Ca2+ and Mg2+ ions with high concentrations (e.g., 16 000 mg/L Ca2+ and 2000 mg/L Mg2+) or Fe2+ ions (e.g., 10-15 mg/L Fe2+) shows detrimental impacts on the phosphonate inhibitor diethylenetriamine penta(methylene phosphonic acid) (DTPMP). Further experimental results show that the presence of Ca,Mg silicate complex/interactions does not change the impacts of Ca2+ and Mg2+ on DTPMP, while the formation of Fe(II) silicate complex/interactions helps to partially recover the detrimental impacts of Fe2+ on phosphonate inhibitors. The mechanism of Fe(II) silicate influence on barite inhibition with DTPMP was studied by measuring the Fe2+, silica, and DTPMP concentrations in the aqueous phase before and after the experiments. The results indicate that this phenomenon is due to the Fe2+ competition between forming Fe(II)-DTPMP precipitates with DTPMP and forming Fe(II) silicate complex/interactions; silica is over 50 times higher in concentration than DTPMP. More Fe(II) silicate interaction results in less Fe(II)-DTPMP formation and more DTPMP available as scale inhibitors. Such observations inform the impact of the widely present silica species on scale inhibitor performances and provide valuable insights in oilfield scale management.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据