4.7 Article

Paraffin/Ti3C2Tx Mxene@Gelatin Aerogels Composite Phase-Change Materials with High Solar-Thermal Conversion Efficiency and Enhanced Thermal Conductivity for Thermal Energy Storage

期刊

ENERGY & FUELS
卷 35, 期 3, 页码 2805-2814

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c04275

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Project [2018YFC1901503]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2652019151]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52002004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The novel paraffin/Ti3C2Tx@gelatin (PA/T@G) composite phase-change materials show high load rates and large melting enthalpies, with improved thermal conductivity and solar-thermal conversion efficiency, making them a promising material for solar-thermal energy storage applications.
The application of phase-change materials (PCMs) for solar energy utilization and thermal energy storage is limited by their low thermal conductivity, undesirable solar-thermal conversion efficiency, and poor shape stability. Here, the novel paraffin/Ti3C2Tx@gelatin (PA/T@G) composite PCMs were successfully obtained by encapsulating paraffin (PA) into gelatin aerogels modified by Ti3C2Tx nanosheets. Three-dimensional (3D) porous gelatin aerogel acted as a favorable supporting material for PA with large enthalpy, while the Ti3C2Tx nanosheets contributed to enhancing the thermal conductivity and converting solar energy into thermal energy by trapping photons and heating molecules. The results exhibited that the composite PCMs had high load rates (96.3-97.7%) and large melting enthalpies (184.7-199.9 J/g). The thermal conductivity of PA/T-30@G was 0.919 W/(m.K), which reached up to 3.48 times that of PA, and the solar-thermal conversion efficiency of the composite PCMs was greatly improved via the introduction of Ti3C2Tx nanosheets. Notably, the composite PCMs with good shape and thermal stability is a promising material for solar-thermal energy storage applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据