4.7 Article

Performing price scenario analysis and stress testing using quantile regression: A case study of the Californian electricity market

期刊

ENERGY
卷 214, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.118796

关键词

California electricity market; Quantile regression; Risk management

资金

  1. Research Council of Norway through the research center NTRANS, RCN [296205]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper uses quantile regression to demonstrate the relationship between electricity price distributions and fundamental supply and demand variables, finding that natural gas, greenhouse gas allowance prices, and load have a positive effect on electricity prices, while solar production and wind production have a negative effect. The proposed approach can serve as a helpful risk management tool for participants in the electricity market.
This paper uses quantile regression to demonstrate how electricity price distributions are linked to fundamental supply and demand variables. It investigates the California electricity market (zone SP15) for selected trading hours using data from January 8, 2013 to September 24, 2016. The approach quantifies a non-linear relationship between the fundamentals and electricity prices, just as predicted by the merit order curve. Natural gas, greenhouse gas allowance prices and load all have a positive effect on electricity prices, with the effect increasing with the quantiles. In contrast, solar production and wind production both have a negative effect on electricity prices. The effect of solar production increases with quantiles, whereas the effect of wind production decreases with quantiles. This paper also includes a stress testing case study in which a producer faces the risk of high solar and wind production, and investigates the effect on the lower tail of the price distribution. Overall, the results demonstrate how the proposed approach can be a helpful risk management tool for participants in the electricity market. (C) 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据