4.7 Article

Visual test and evolutionary analysis of flow fields in cylinder of helical intake port diesel engine

期刊

ENERGY
卷 223, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.119926

关键词

Diesel engine; Helical intake port; Visual steady-flow test; Transient flow field evolution

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51665023, 51666007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By combining visual steady flow testing and CFD simulation methods, this paper aims to study the characteristics of flow fields near curved surfaces such as cylinder walls and combustion chambers. The results show that swirl ratio and airflow movement have significant effects on the quality of the air-fuel mixture and combustion efficiency.
The paper intends to overcome the difficulties associated with conventional PIV test techniques in measuring the flow fields near curved surfaces. So the paper combines the visual steady flow test and the CFD simulation method, to help observe the law of particle distribution near the cylinder wall directly, and reveal the law of steady/transient flow field movement and airflow evolution. The results show that the distribution of particle density and the gradient boundary lines of the tracer concentration correspond to those of the CFD simulation. Therefore, a visual test can display the characteristics of the movement of air in the cylinder near the wall. The swirl ratio of each radial section in the cylinder and the omega combustion chamber during the intake stroke is influenced by the intake airflow, while the swirl ratio during the compression stroke is determined by the piston movement. At the end of a compression stroke, the location of the highest swirl ratio directly influences the air-fuel mixture. As a result, analyzing the swirl ratio and evolutionary process of the flow fields near the wall of the cylinder and combustion chamber help improve the quality of the air-fuel mixture and the efficiency of combustion. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据