4.5 Article

The Effect of Static Magnetic Field on Methanogenesis in the Anaerobic Digestion of Municipal Sewage Sludge

期刊

ENERGIES
卷 14, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en14030590

关键词

municipal sewage sludge (MSS); anaerobic sludge (AS); anaerobic digestion (AD); static magnetic field (SMF); biogas; methane (CH4)

资金

  1. [010/RID/2018/19]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigated the effect of a 17.6 mT static magnetic field on the efficiency of anaerobic digestion of municipal sewage sludge. Results showed significant impact on methane production efficiency, fermentation rate, and bacterial community structure, but no effect on cumulative biogas production. Longer exposure time to the magnetic field led to decreased efficiency and reduced populations of methanogens in the anaerobic sludge.
The present study aimed to determine the effect of a 17.6 mT static magnetic field (SMF) on the efficiency of anaerobic digestion (AD) of municipal sewage sludge (MSS). The SMF had a significant impact on methane (CH4) production efficiency, the levels of fermentation rate (eta FMSS) vs. removal rate (eta VS), and the structure of the anaerobic bacteria consortium, but it did not affect cumulative biogas production. The highest CH4 yield (431 +/- 22 dm(CH4)(3)/kgVS) and the highest methane content in the biogas (66.1% +/- 1.9%) were found in the variant in which the SMF exposure time was 144 min/day. This variant also produced the highest eta FMSS and eta VS values, reaching 73.8% +/- 2.3% and eta VS 36.9% +/- 1.6%, respectively. Longer anaerobic sludge retention time in the SMF area significantly decreased AD efficiency and caused a significant reduction in the number of methanogens in the anaerobic bacteria community. The lowest values were observed for SMF exposure time of 432 min/day, which produced only 54.8 +/- 1.9% CH4 in the biogas. A pronounced reduction was recorded in the Archaea (ARC915) and Methanosaeta (MX825) populations in the anaerobic sludge, i.e., to 20% +/- 11% and 6% +/- 2%, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据