4.8 Article

Architecture of the active post-translational Sec translocon

期刊

EMBO JOURNAL
卷 40, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.15252/embj.2020105643

关键词

post‐ translational translocation; protein translocation; sec complex; signal sequence

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft through the Collaborative Research Council (CRC) 174
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft through the DFG-core facility for interactions, dynamics, and macromolecular assembly structure

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The article presents a cryo-EM structure of the yeast Sec complex bound to a substrate and a crystal structure of the Sec62 cytosolic domain. The study revealed that the gate of the Sec complex is in a more open conformation when the signal sequence is inserted, flanked by Sec62 transmembrane helices. The interaction between Sec62 domain and Sec63 C-terminus was also mapped.
In eukaryotes, most secretory and membrane proteins are targeted by an N-terminal signal sequence to the endoplasmic reticulum, where the trimeric Sec61 complex serves as protein-conducting channel (PCC). In the post-translational mode, fully synthesized proteins are recognized by a specialized channel additionally containing the Sec62, Sec63, Sec71, and Sec72 subunits. Recent structures of this Sec complex in the idle state revealed the overall architecture in a pre-opened state. Here, we present a cryo-EM structure of the yeast Sec complex bound to a substrate, and a crystal structure of the Sec62 cytosolic domain. The signal sequence is inserted into the lateral gate of Sec61 alpha similar to previous structures, yet, with the gate adopting an even more open conformation. The signal sequence is flanked by two Sec62 transmembrane helices, the cytoplasmic N-terminal domain of Sec62 is more rigidly positioned, and the plug domain is relocated. We crystallized the Sec62 domain and mapped its interaction with the C-terminus of Sec63. Together, we obtained a near-complete and integrated model of the active Sec complex.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据