4.8 Article

SATB2-LEMD2 interaction links nuclear shape plasticity to regulation of cognition-related genes

期刊

EMBO JOURNAL
卷 40, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.15252/embj.2019103701

关键词

chromatin; human cognitive ability; neuronal activity; nuclear envelope; SATB2

资金

  1. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [FWF-DK W1206, FWF- SFB F44, FWF-P25014-B24, FWF-P33027-B, FWF-P32850-B, FWF-P27606, FWF-P30441, FWF-P32960]
  2. Medical University of Innsbruck [MUI-Start 2010012004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Interactions between SATB2 and the inner nuclear membrane protein LEMD2 influence gene expression programs in pyramidal neurons that are linked to cognitive ability and psychiatric disorder etiology.
SATB2 is a schizophrenia risk gene and is genetically associated with human intelligence. How it affects cognition at molecular level is currently unknown. Here, we show that interactions between SATB2, a chromosomal scaffolding protein, and the inner nuclear membrane protein LEMD2 orchestrate the response of pyramidal neurons to neuronal activation. Exposure to novel environment in vivo causes changes in nuclear shape of CA1 hippocampal neurons via a SATB2-dependent mechanism. The activity-driven plasticity of the nuclear envelope requires not only SATB2, but also its protein interactor LEMD2 and the ESCRT-III/VPS4 membrane-remodeling complex. Furthermore, LEMD2 depletion in cortical neurons, similar to SATB2 ablation, affects neuronal activity-dependent regulation of multiple rapid and delayed primary response genes. In human genetic data, LEMD2-regulated genes are enriched for de novo mutations reported in intellectual disability and schizophrenia and are, like SATB2-regulated genes, enriched for common variants associated with schizophrenia and cognitive function. Hence, interactions between SATB2 and the inner nuclear membrane protein LEMD2 influence gene expression programs in pyramidal neurons that are linked to cognitive ability and psychiatric disorder etiology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据