4.6 Article

Neural text similarity of user reviews for improving collaborative filtering recommender systems

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.elerap.2020.101019

关键词

Recommender systems; Natural language processing; Neural text representation; Text similarity; User review

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The paper presents a model to enhance recommender systems by finding similar users based on their reviews in addition to their ratings. Experimental results show that the model based on Long Short Term Memory (LSTM) network achieves the best performance.
According to the advent of technology and the expansion of using the World Wide Web, there has been an enormous increase in the number of Internet retailers and their customers. The amount of data is exploding due to the numerous users and the variety of products. In such a condition, recommender systems play an important role in helping users and providing suggestions based on their taste. Using recommender systems' suggestions, users can save their time on finding their personalized, useful, and favorite items without being overwhelmed by a large set of items. User-based collaborative filtering recommender systems for each user find similar users based on their ratings and suggest their favorite products to the intended user. In this paper, we present a model to improve recommender systems by finding similar users based on their reviews in addition to their ratings. To this end, we compute users' reviews similarity utilizing seven different approaches, out of which two techniques are lexical-based, two techniques benefit from the neural representation of words, and three techniques are based on the neural representation of texts. Our experiments on two different datasets from Amazon show that the proposed model for capturing review's similarity significantly improved the performance of the recommender system. Moreover, the model based on Long Short Term Memory (LSTM) network achieves the best results.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据