4.6 Article

ZIF-67 derived nitrogen doped CNTs decorated with sulfur and Ni(OH)2 as potential electrode material for high-performance supercapacitors

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 364, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2020.137147

关键词

ZIF-67; NCNTs; Ni(OH)(2); Nanocomposites; Supercapacitors; Energy storage

资金

  1. U.S.-Pakistan Center for Advanced Studies in Energy (USPCASE) at NUST

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Herein we report the synthesis of nitrogen-doped carbon nanotubes (NC) based sulfide (S) and nickel hydroxide (NH) supported on nickel foam as a novel electrode material for the supercapacitors (abbreviated as Co/NC/S@NH). A class of zeolitic imidazolate frameworks, ZIF-67 (Co), is initially grown to synthesize nanotubes directly on the nickel foam (NF). The anion exchange reactions are performed for the growth of sulfide and nickel hydroxide on ZIF-67 (Co) derived carbon nanotubes. In the structural analysis, X-ray diffraction confirmed the successful in-situ growth of carbon nanotubes. Transmission electron microscopy was employed to confirm the formation of NC-based sulfide and nickel hydroxide. The Co/NC/S@NH, hierarchical hybrid electrode, exhibited improved capacitance of 1636 F/g at 1 A/g (982 C/g or 273 mA/h) with exceptional cyclic stability. The Co/NC/S@NH showed capacity retention of 94% over 5,000 cycles. The enhanced electrochemical performance of the synthesized electrode is due to the improved redox reactions and direct growth of nitrogen-doped carbon nanotubes on 3D nickel foam which act as superhighways for electron transportation. Moreover, the sulfur ions could hinder the collapse of a structure by the intercalation among layers, whereas the extremely hydroxylated surface of Ni(OH)(2) nanosheets could promote accessibility of ions to the electrolyte which decreases the resistance of electrodes which agreed with the finding from electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据