4.6 Article

A mass production paper-making method to prepare superior flexible electrodes and asymmetric supercapacitors with high volumetric capacitance

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 367, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2020.137409

关键词

Hardwood fiber; NiCo2S4; Supercapacitor; Flexible; Cellulose nanofiber

资金

  1. Shaanxi University of Science Technology [SUST 2017BJ-34]
  2. Natural Science Basic Research Plan in Shaanxi Province of China [2020 JQ-708]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, flexible electrodes for supercapacitors were prepared using hardwood fiber (HWF), multi-walled carbon nanotube (MWCNT), and NiCo2S4 powder through a paper-making process. These electrodes showed advantages of low cost, mass production, high specific capacitance, and excellent cycling stability.
In this study, paper supported flexible electrodes for supercapacitors are prepared by paper-making process with the hardwood fiber (HWF), multi-walled carbon nanotube (MWCNT) and NiCo2S4 powder. Compared with previous reported cellulose nanofiber (CNF), nickel foam and carbon cloth supported electrodes, the HWF supported paper electrodes demonstrate its advantages of low-cost, mass production, low-thickness and superior flexibility. It can achieve a high specific capacitance of 1725 F g(-1) at 1 A g(-1), a remarkable rate retention of 79.3 % from 1 A g(-1) to 10 A g(-1), an ultrahigh volumetric specific capacitance of 246.4 F cm(-3) at 1 mA cm(-2) and an excellent cycling stability at 20 A g(-1) after 5000 cycles. The as-fabricated HWF supported flexible asymmetric supercapacitors (ASCs) have achieved excellent volumetric specific capacitance of 10.25 F cm(-3) and energy density of 10.1 mWh cm(-3) with power density of 93.9 mW cm(-3). All results suggest that the paper-making method and the HWF supported paper electrodes provide great opportunity for developing high-performance flexible energy-storage electrodes with the feasibility of mass production. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据