4.6 Article

Interface stability of LiCl-rich argyrodite Li6PS5Cl with propylene carbonate boosts high-performance lithium batteries

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 363, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2020.137128

关键词

Li6PS5Cl; Argyrodite electrolyte; LiCl-rich; Interface; Lithium battery

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Grant under the Vechicle Technologics Office [EE0008866]
  2. Conn Center for Renewable Energy Research
  3. EVPI Internal Grant of the University of Louisville
  4. NASA KY Graduate Fellowship [NNX15ARG91-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In solid-state lithium (Li)-metal batteries (SSLMBs), sulfide-based Li-ion conductors represent one of the most popular solid electrolytes (SEs). However, the development of sulfide-based SSLMBs is significantly hampered by interfacial issues including large solid-solid contact resistance and serious side reactions at the SE/electrode interface. To address these issues, here, we demonstrated a simple and efficient strategy by using LiCl-rich argyrodite Li6PS5Cl (Li6PS5Cl-LiCl) SE and trace amount of propylene carbonate (PC) at the SE/electrode interface to facilitate the formation of stable and robust solid electrolyte interphase (SEI). The formed SEI not only serves as a buffer layer to passivate the interfacial reactions and suppress Li dendrite growth, but also acts as a bridge for Li-ion conduction to reduce the contact resistance. As a result, the Li parallel to Li symmetric cell exhibited long-term electrochemical cycling stability over 1000 h at a current density of 0.2 mA cm(-2). Furthermore, the assembled Li parallel to Li4Ti5O12 (LTO) batteries delivered a specific capacity of 175 mAh g(-1) at 0.2 C, and remained an excellent specific capacity of 116 mAh g(-1) after 200 cycles at a high current rate of 1 C. These features indicate a feasible strategy to enhance the interfacial property of high-performance SSLMBs. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据