4.6 Article

The significance of the local structure of cobalt-based catalysts on the photoelectrochemical water oxidation activity of BiVO4

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 366, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2020.137467

关键词

Water oxidation kinetics; BiVO4; Cobalt-based catalyst; Local structure; Atomic layer deposition

资金

  1. Scientific and Technical Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) [114Z305]
  2. Turkish Accelerator & Radiation Laboratory (TARLA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, cobalt-based catalysts were deposited on nanoporous BiVO4 with controlled thicknesses by atomic layer deposition (ALD). Different water oxidation activities in neutral pH conditions were observed, with the best performance achieved when a uniform ultrathin Co(OH)(2) layer was formed on BiVO4 surface.
The local structures of the water oxidation catalysts play an important role in reaction kinetics and the performance of the photoanodes. In this study, we deposited cobalt-based catalysts on nanoporous BiVO4 with controlled thicknesses by atomic layer deposition (ALD). Despite the similar oxidation states of cobalt in all depositions, different water oxidation activities in neutral pH conditions were observed. A dramatic photocurrent raise, lowered kinetic overpotential, and smaller charge transfer resistance across the photoanode/electrolyte interface were achieved when a uniform ultrathin Co(OH)(2) layer was formed on BiVO4. Photocurrent density for water oxidation showed a 95% enhancement at 0.6 V vs. RHE when the catalyst was in the form of Co(OH)(2), while an 80% increase was obtained for CoO. Ideal coordination of Co(OH)(2) on hydroxylated BiVO4 surface assists the charge transfer between the electrolyte and BiVO4 without increasing surface recombination. The results of this study emphasize the importance of controlling the local structure of the catalysts in the performance of the water splitting photoanodes. (c) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据