4.2 Article

Chemical Activation of Nitrogen-doped Carbon Derived from Chitosan with ZnCl2 to Produce a High-performance Gas Diffusion-type Oxygen Electrode

期刊

ELECTROCHEMISTRY
卷 89, 期 1, 页码 36-42

出版社

ELECTROCHEMICAL SOC JAPAN
DOI: 10.5796/electrochemistry.20-00121

关键词

Oxygen Reduction Reaction; Gas Diffusion-type Electrode; Porous Carbon; Nitrogen-doped Carbon

资金

  1. Kyushu University Platform of Inter/Transdisciplinary Energy Research Support Program for Doctoral Students fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study fabricated nitrogen-doped carbons derived from chitosan and investigated the effect of activation temperature on their microstructure, showing the importance of controlling activation temperature on performance. Experimental results demonstrated that the microstructure of NDCs plays a key role in electrode performance.
In this study, we fabricated nitrogen-doped carbons (NDCs) derived from chitosan using a new synthesis method that combines the thermal decomposition of chitosan and chemical activation with ZnCl2. Then, the effect of the activation temperature on the microstructure of NDCs was investigated. The performance of a gas diffusion-type oxygen electrode (GDE) using the obtained NDCs was evaluated using an oxygen reduction reaction in an alkaline solution. Finally, the relationship between the microstructure of NDCs and electrode performance was discussed. The surface area and total pore volume of the fabricated NDCs tended to increase with activation temperature, despite decreasing nitrogen content. Additionally, we found that the overpotential of GDE decreases with an increase in specific surface area and total pore volume. The microstructure of the NDCs was found to play a key role in improving the performance of GDEs. Furthermore, the GDE composed of fabricated NDCs with a high surface area and high pore volume exhibited a reduced activation overpotential than that of conventional Pt-loaded carbon black. (c) The Author(s) 2020. Published by ECSJ.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据