4.6 Article

The impact of bioengineering techniques for riverbank protection on ecosystem services of riparian zones

期刊

ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING
卷 158, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2020.106040

关键词

Biotechnical streambank stabilization; Riverbank restoration; Self-purification; Carbon sequestration; Nature-based solution; Buffer zone

资金

  1. German Federal Ministry of Transport and Digital Infrastructure (BMVI)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rivers and floodplains are hotspots of biodiversity and provide an exceptional number of ecological functions. However, they are negatively affected by human impact worldwide. The need for restoration is high, but its realization is often hampered by antagonistic human interests. Replacing artificial riverbank protection with bioengineering techniques can be a first and straightforward step to restore riparian ecosystems. However, bioengineering still plays a marginal role in river management. We aim to introduce new arguments for bioengineering along riverbanks by applying the ecosystem service approach. We focus on major regulating services usually provided by floodplains. Denitrification and phosphorous retention were estimated by applying proxy-based models. Carbon sequestration within vegetation was calculated using biomass equations. Our study clearly indicates an increase of ecosystem services by bioengineering measures compared to conventionally fixed riverbanks. The dismantling of riprap removes up to 30 times more nitrogen and 20 times more phosphorous from the river load. Additional slope lowering increases both values up to 50-fold. The carbon storage capacity is four times higher in reed beds and 30 times higher in willow-brush mattresses. Our results show that bioengineering techniques for riverbank protection can be a feasible tool to support general efforts towards enhancing the self-purification of rivers and contribute to mitigating climate change, especially if conducted on a larger scale.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据