4.4 Article

Practical seismic resilience evaluation and crisis management planning through GIS-based vulnerability assessment of buildings

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11803-021-2003-1

关键词

seismic resilience; crisis management; vulnerability assessment; earthquake; retrofit; AHP; Expert Choice; GIS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper demonstrates the effectiveness of seismic vulnerability assessment in protecting against earthquakes through a case study in a densely populated urban area near an active fault. By analyzing vulnerability factors, conducting field campaigns, using multi-criteria decision making methods, and applying earthquake scenarios, the seismic resilience and vulnerability state of the study area were evaluated.
The objective of this paper is to demonstrate how assessment of seismic vulnerability can be effective in protection against earthquakes. Findings are reported from a case study in a densely populated urban area near an active fault, utilizing practical methods and exact engineering data. Vulnerability factors were determined due to technical considerations, and a field campaign was performed to collect the required data. Multi-criteria decision making was carried out by means of an analytical hierarchy process including a fuzzy standardization. Earthquake scenarios were applied through an implicit vulnerability model. GIS was utilized and the results were analyzed by classifying the state of vulnerability in levels as very low, low, moderate, high, and very high. Seismic resilience was evaluated as vulnerabilities below the moderate state, being about 40% in an intensity of 6 Mercalli and less than 10% in 10 Mercalli. It is concluded that seismic resilience in the area studied is not acceptable, the area is vulnerable in the expected scenarios, and due to the high seismicity of the region, proper crisis management planning is required in parallel with attempts toward retrofitting. In this regard, an emergency map was developed with reference to the assessed vulnerabilities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据