4.7 Article

Second-order nonlinear optical properties of Λ-shaped pyrazine derivatives

期刊

DYES AND PIGMENTS
卷 184, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.dyepig.2020.108850

关键词

Pyrazines; Nonlinear optics; Hyper-Rayleigh scattering; First hyperpolarizability; Kleinman symmetry; Density functional theory

资金

  1. CNRS
  2. Region Nouvelle Aquitaine
  3. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic [LTAIN19101]
  4. Belgian Government (IUAP) [P7/5]
  5. Francqui Foundation
  6. FNRS-FRFC [2.4.617.07.F, 2.5020.11]
  7. Conseil Regional d'Aquitaine
  8. French Ministry of Research and Technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the linear and nonlinear optical properties of a series of A-shaped derivatives and demonstrates that these compounds possess two low-lying excited electronic states close in energy, contributing additively to the first hyperpolarizability with a dominant dipolar character. The NLO responses significantly deviate from Kleinman's index permutation symmetry, as shown through both experimental and theoretical analyses.
The linear and nonlinear optical (NLO) properties of a series of A-shaped derivatives containing a 4,5-dicyanopyrazine acceptor unit, N,N-dimethylamino donor groups and systematically enlarged pi-conjugated linkers are investigated by means of UV/Visible and Hyper-Rayleigh scattering spectroscopies. Density functional theory calculations are also carried out to rationalize the magnitude and symmetry of the NLO responses. The results demonstrate that these compounds possess two low-lying excited electronic states close to each other in energy, which are accessible through one-photon optical transitions respectively polarized perpendicular and parallel to the two-fold molecular axis. These two states contribute additively to the first hyperpolarizability, which exhibits a dominant dipolar character. We also show that the NLO responses significantly deviate from Kleinman's index permutation symmetry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据