4.5 Article

Spray-dried thyme essential oil microparticles using different polymeric matrices

期刊

DRYING TECHNOLOGY
卷 39, 期 12, 页码 1883-1894

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/07373937.2021.1871917

关键词

Spray drying; whey protein isolate; maltodextrin; chitosan; microencapsulation

资金

  1. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior Brazil (CAPES) [001]
  2. FAPEMIG (Minas Gerais State Foundation for Research Development, Brazil) [CAG-PPM-00318-11]
  3. CNPq (National Council for Scientific and Technological Development, Brazil) [448530/2014-7]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to evaluate the properties of thyme essential oil encapsulated by spray drying, as well as to investigate the effects of replacing whey protein isolate with maltodextrin and chitosan. The results showed that the mixture of maltodextrin and chitosan was effective in maintaining antioxidant activity.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the physical, physicochemical, rheological, and morphological properties and antioxidant capacity of thyme essential oil encapsulated by spray drying; as well as to verify the effects of the partial replacement of whey protein isolate by maltodextrin and chitosan. The presence of maltodextrin decreased viscosity of the emulsion; decreased moisture, density, and mean volume diameter, and maintained the oil retention percentage and solubility of the microparticles. All treatments showed low hygroscopicity, being chitosan considered an alternative to reduce this parameter. Phenolic monoterpene thymol was characterized as the major constituent in all samples. The carrier agents were efficient in maintaining antioxidant activity when compared to pure thyme essential oil. In general, they showed spherical shapes and smooth surfaces with slight roughness. The mixture of maltodextrin and chitosan, in partial replacement of whey protein isolate, represents a promising opportunity in obtaining thyme essential oil microparticles by spray drying process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据