4.4 Article

Increase in drugs-of-abuse findings in post-mortem toxicology due to COVID-19 restrictions-First observations in Finland

期刊

DRUG TESTING AND ANALYSIS
卷 13, 期 4, 页码 867-870

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/dta.2982

关键词

COVID-19; drug-related death; harm-reduction; post-mortem toxicology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Evidence-based data shows that during the COVID-19 pandemic, the numbers of buprenorphine, amphetamine, and cannabis findings in post-mortem investigations have increased significantly, with the most noticeable rise seen in amphetamine across all age groups. These findings indicate the reality of increased risks of drug-related harm and the urgent need for significant actions to assist this vulnerable group of individuals.
A lot has been published on the anticipated effects of the current COVID-19 pandemic on users of illegal drugs. In this study, we present evidence-based data on such effects, namely, the increased number of drug findings in post-mortem investigations. All post-mortem toxicology cases positive for at least one of the following: buprenorphine, amphetamine or cannabis, were investigated in the first 8 months of the year 2020, and the monthly numbers were compared to those in the previous 5 years from 2015 to 2019. These substances served as indicator analytes that could reveal changes in the drug using population. Right after the government restrictions came into force in March 2020, the numbers of buprenorphine, amphetamine and cannabis findings increased. The increase was most noticeable for amphetamine and was evident in all age groups. Our findings indicate that the assumptions on the increased risk of drug-related harm (including death) have become reality. Reduced access to harm-reduction services seems to have increased the mortality among individuals that use buprenorphine, amphetamine or cannabis. Significant and prompt actions need to be taken in order to find new ways in helping this vulnerable group of people.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据