4.4 Article

Proteolysis targeting chimera (PROTAC) for epidermal growth factor receptor enhances anti-tumor immunity in non-small cell lung cancer

期刊

DRUG DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH
卷 82, 期 3, 页码 422-429

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ddr.21765

关键词

EGFR; IDO1; NSCLC; PD‐ L1; PROTAC

资金

  1. Foundations of Nanjing Medical University [NMUB2019247]
  2. Nanjing Health Select Committee [YKK19145]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Immunotherapy has transformed NSCLC treatment, but challenges remain in enhancing efficacy; Inhibiting EGFR may overcome resistance to immunotherapy in NSCLC; PROTAC showed potential in downregulating PD-L1 and IDO1 levels and enhancing anti-tumor immunity in NSCLC.
While immunotherapy has dramatically revolutionized the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), it still faces challenges such as low therapeutic efficacy and immune-related adverse events, indicating that safe and effective approaches to enhance NSCLC immunotherapy are still highly demanded. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is an established target for molecularly targeted therapy of NSCLC. Overexpression and activating mutations of EGFR can promote the resistance of NSCLC to immunotherapy via upregulating inhibitory immune checkpoints such as programmed death receptor ligand 1 (PD-L1) and indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase-1 (IDO1). Thus, therapeutic inhibition of EGFR also holds promise in modulating the immune microenvironment to advance NSCLC immunotherapy. In this study, we employed a proteolysis targeting chimera (PROTAC) that degrades EGFR(L858R) to investigate its potential in dually inhibiting PD-L1 and IDO1 to potentiate the anti-tumor immunity in NSCLC. We demonstrated that PROTAC significantly downregulated the protein levels of both PD-L1 and IDO1 in NSCLC H3255 cell and tumor. We also confirmed that PROTAC significantly suppressed the H3255 tumor growth and enhanced the anti-tumor immune response in H3255 tumor. Overall, our study provides a novel strategy for future NSCLC therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据